Allahabad High Court
BAIL/35996/2026 of AKSHAY CHAUDHARY Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35996 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Dhiraj Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35996 of 2026
Court No. - 68
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Dhiraj Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.221 of 2026, under Section 317(2) B.N.S., Police Station Sihanigate, District Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that in the instant case, the applicant was granted bail by this Court vide order dated 21.09.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.33393 of 2026, and later on, the final report (charge-sheet) has been submitted in the added Section 317(2) of B.N.S. The applicant has not misused the said opportunity granted earlier and has cooperated during the trial and is ready to do so in future also. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 05.07.2026, and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
5. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicant has Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dhiraj Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Akshay Chaudhary .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant- Akshay Chaudhary, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.
8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 8, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 35996 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad