Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11495/2025 of SAURABH PATHAK Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11495 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J. 1. Heard Mr. Sujan Singh, the learned counsel for petitioner, the learned A.G.A. representing State - respondents 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 and Mr. Shashank
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11495 of 2025
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Sujan Singh, the learned counsel for petitioner, the learned A.G.A. representing State - respondents 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 and Mr. Shashank Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Hare Ram Pandey, the learned counsel representing respondent 8.
2. Perused the record.
3. Petitioner Saurabh Pathak has approached this Court by means of present criminal misc. writ petition with the following prayer :
(i) Issue an order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents 2 to 5 to constitute an enquiry / investigation regarding the act of respondents 6 and 7 and decide the representation / complaint dated 12.05.2025 by passing an appropriate order in accordance with law.
(ii) Issue an order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
4. After some arguments, the learned counsel for petitioner fairly submits that present writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Learned A.G.A. representing State - respondents 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 and the learned counsel representing respondent 8 have no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner.
6. In view of above, this writ petition shall stand dismissed as withdrawn.
7. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shreesh Srivastava, Sujan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Dwivedi, G.A., Hare Ram Pandey Saurabh Pathak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s)
8. However, this order shall be without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. October 8, 2026 ss CRLP No. 11495 of 2025 2 (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad