Allahabad High Court

NA528/40284/2026 of MANSOOR ALAM AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40284 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants to quash the impugned summoning

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40284 of 2026

Court No. - 72

HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants to quash the impugned summoning order dated 02.12.2023 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Moradabad, as well as the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 16651 of 2023 (Ameenuddin Vs. Mansoor Alam and others) whereby the learned judge summoned the applicants for the offence under Sections 324, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Civil Lines, District Moradabad, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Moradabad.

3. On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for the applicants have not pressed the relief as sought by means of this application on merit and prayed for issuance of appropriate direction to the concerned Courts below to decide the bail application of the applicants expeditiously.

4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in allowing the aforesaid prayer of the applicants.

5. Accordingly the relief as sought by the applicants through this application is refused.

6. Considering the aforesaid alternative prayer of the applicants, it is directed that applicants shall surrender before the concerned Court below within three weeks from today and in case applies for bail, the bail application shall be decided expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Danish Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mansoor Alam And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC

922.

7. For the period of three weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the Court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against them.

8. With the aforesaid directions, this application under Section 528 BNSS stands disposed of. October 8, 2026 Nitin Verma NA528 No. 40284 of 2026 2 (Deepak Verma,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead