Allahabad High Court

CRLP/22937/2026 of PUSHPENDRA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22937 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main relief:- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22937 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main relief:- "Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 to investigation the matter in fair manner and conclude the investigation of Case Crime No. 77 of 2026 under section 109, 352 BNS, Police Station Mataudh, District Banda, within reasonable time as fixed by this Hon'ble court, otherwise petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury."

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents submitted that after completion of investigation, final report has been forwarded to the court concerned on 14.07.2026.

3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law, if advised.

4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that final report has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Afshan Shafaut, Sushil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Pushpendra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s)

petition pending for further adjudication.

6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. October 8, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 22937 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead