Allahabad High Court
NA529/4895/2026 of RAM BACHAN YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4895 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4895 of 2026
Court No. - 82
HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record.
2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned for early disposal of Misc. Case No. 360 of 2026 (Ram Bachan Yadav Vs. Beerkeshwar Kumar & Others), under Sections- 173(4) BNSS, Police Station- Bhatni, District- Deoria, pending before the C.J.M., Court No.17, Deoria.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the said application U/s 173(4) BNSS has been moved on behalf of applicant on 03.02.2026, which is still pending and considerable time has already been lapsed.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid application in accordance with law, keeping in view the directions issued by this Court vide Letter No. 1393/APAaR-DJ Cell/Allahabad Dated 25.01.2025, as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. October 8, 2026 KK Patel Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradip Kumar Rai, Rishi Kant Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Ram Bachan Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad