Allahabad High Court
A227/14236/2026 of RAKESH KUMAR GARG Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14236 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i). Issue an order or direction, direct to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Koil, Aligarh to decide Case No. 209 of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14236 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i). Issue an order or direction, direct to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Koil, Aligarh to decide Case No. 209 of 2021 (Rakesh Kumar vs. Rajendra & others), pending since 2021 expeditiously within stipulated time as directed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. The prayer made in the writ petition cannot be granted in view of the judgment of Constitution Bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others (2024) 6 SCC 267.
3. However, when the Court was going to dismiss the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 6-C application filed in Case No.209 of 2021 is pending consideration and the may be decided expeditiously.
4. In view of above, as no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit, or issuing notice to private respondents, writ is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), Koil, Aligarh to decide 6-C application filed in Case No. No.209 of 2021, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
5. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharam Veer Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Satish Chaturvedi Rakesh Kumar Garg .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits.
7. Sri Prem Prakash Srivastava, learned counsel has appeared for respondent no.7-Bank. October 8, 2026 SK Goswami A227 No. 14236 of 2026 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad