Allahabad High Court
BAIL/16985/2025 of KULLO ALIAS KALI CHARAN Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16985 of 2025 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. Supplementary Rejoinder Affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Ashish Goyal, Advocate holding brief of Ms Manju Yadav, learned counsel
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16985 of 2025
Court No. - 68
HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. List has been revised. Supplementary Rejoinder Affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard Sri Ashish Goyal, Advocate holding brief of Ms Manju Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjeev Singh, learned AAG assisted by Ms Ifra Islam, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record.
3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 198 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, Police Station Farah, District Mathura, during the pendency of trial.
4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is in jail since 19.03.2025 and the period of incarceration is more than one and half years but the trial is at stand still.
5. This Court had called for the status of the trial, as per status report dated 12.08.2026, co accused persons are absconding as such the case is fixed for their presence. It also reveals that the charge has not been framed.
6. Learned counsel for the applicant has further argued that the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Lalit Kumar Shukla, Manju Yadav, Neeraj Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. Kullo Alias Kali Charan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
applicant has explained the criminal hisotry. He undertakes to cooperate with the trial and not misuse the liberty of bail.
7. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant could not be disputed.
8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration the fact that applicant is in jail since more than one and half years, and there being no likelihood of early conclusion of the trial in near future, and the applicant has explained the criminal hisotry and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
9. Let the applicant- Kullo @ Kali Charan, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.
10. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 8, 2026 RavindraKSingh BAIL No. 16985 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad