Allahabad High Court

NA529/4883/2026 of PRATEEKSHA GUPTA Vs STATE OF U.P. on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4883 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed to direct the court concerned to decide the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4883 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed to direct the court concerned to decide the Case No. 498/2022, under Section-498A, 323, 504, 506, 354A, 406 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Aact Police Station Kotwali Katra District Mirzapur, expeditiously within a stipulated period. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the aforesaid case has been pending since 2022. It is further submitted that, out of the six accused persons, two accused, namely Kedarnath and Badrinath, have approached this Court by filing Application under Section 482 No. 31447 of 2022, wherein the proceedings against the aforesaid two accused have been stayed till the next date of listing. However, the proceedings against the remaining accused persons are still continuing. It is further submitted that an application has also been moved before the court concerned seeking a separate trial, but no order has been passed on the said application till date.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide application for seeking separate trial and thereafter decide the aforesaid case against the rest of the accused persons, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Kumar Gupta, Shyam Dhar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Prateeksha Gupta .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

either of the parties, preferably within a period of one year from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. October 8, 2026 S.K. NA529 No. 4883 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead