Allahabad High Court
A227/13280/2026 of VIJAY BAHADUR YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13280 of 2026 Court No. - 55 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present petition is filed with the following prayer:- "(i) issue a writ order or direction
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13280 of 2026
Court No. - 55
HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present petition is filed with the following prayer:- "(i) issue a writ order or direction in the nature of directing to the Learned Civil Judge Junior Division Jhanshi to decide the complaint Case U/s 138 N.I. Act filed by the petitioner on dated 21.11.2023 in complaint case no. 26944 of 2023 "Vijay Bahadur Yadav Versus Arvind Kumar", within the stipulated period may be fixed by this Hon'ble court."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceedings before the court concerned be directed to be concluded in a time bound manner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the complainant.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Jhanshi to decide the Complaint Case No. 26944 of 2023 (Vijay Bahadur Yadav Versus Arvind Kumar), under Section 138 N.I. Act, within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. October 8, 2026 D. Tamang Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shailesh Kumar Mishra, Vivek Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Vijay Bahadur Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad