Allahabad High Court
NA528/39296/2026 of YOGENDRA PAL SINGH @ BABLU Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39296 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA appearing for the State. 2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 5.1.2024 and
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39296 of 2026
Court No. - 76
HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA appearing for the State.
2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 5.1.2024 and cognizance/summoning order dated 14.10.2024 as well as entire proceedings of Case Crime no. 702 of 2023, under Sections 420, 332 IPC, P.S.- Najibabad, District Bijnor.
3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order, chargesheet and entire proceeding, can be set aside.
4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.
5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection.
6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicant surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, his bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atul Kumar Patel, Krishna Kanhaiya Soni Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Yogendra Pal Singh @ Bablu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825).
7. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicant herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. October 8, 2026 Shaswat NA528 No. 39296 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad