Allahabad High Court
NA528/40479/2026 of MUKUND AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40479 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of charge-sheet dated 01.10.2022,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 40479 of 2026
Court No. - 76
HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.
2. The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of charge-sheet dated 01.10.2022, cognizance/summoning order dated 14.12.2022 and the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No.1416 of 2022 (State Vs. Ratipal Pal and Others) under sections 323, 504, 427, 325 IPC, arising out of Case Crime No.206 of 2026, P.S. Sujanganj, District- Jaunpur, pending before learned court of Judicial Magistrate-I, Court No.17, Jaunpur.
3. On perusal of entire record appended with the instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned charge-sheet, cognizance/summoning order and entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside.
4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused.
5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shyam Shankar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mukund And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. and Another, reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773.
7. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. October 8, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 40479 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad