Allahabad High Court

CRLP/22689/2026 of AKASH YADAV Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22689 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22689 of 2026

Court No. - 48

HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondent No.2/Superintendent of Police, District Azamgarh to consider and decide the representation dated 06.07.2026 moved by the petitioner for transfer and fair investigation by another crime authority relating to case Crime No. 170 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 352, 115(2), 324(4), 351(3), 3(5) of B.N.S.S., Police Station Nizamabad, District Azamgarh lodged by the petitioner/informant, otherwise the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury."

2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been forwarded on 26.08.2026 before the court concerned.

3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A.

4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and perused the material on record. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Akash Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)

5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge-sheet has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.

6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. October 7, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 22689 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead