Allahabad High Court

NA528/43517/2026 of SANDEEP @ BANTY AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 6 October 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43517 of 2026 Court No. - 80 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Akash Patel, learned Counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 43517 of 2026

Court No. - 80

HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. Akash Patel, learned Counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicants with the following prayer: "It is, therefore, Most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned Non bailable warrant issued on 04.05.2026 against the applicants as well as entire criminal proceeding of Case No. 2564 of 2021, Case Crime No. 417 of 2020 Under Sections 498-A, 323, 504 & 506 I.P.C. Police Station Purkaji District Muzaffarnagar, pending before the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Court No. 2, Muzaffarnagar."

3. After some argument, learned Counsel for the applicants has made a statement at the Bar that he does not wish to press other prayers made in the application and states that the applicants are ready to surrender before the Trial Court within three weeks and seek their bail and that the bail application be considered and disposed of in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773.

4. Learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by the Counsel for the applicants for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.

5. In view of the above, in case the applicants appear before the Trial Court Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Akash Patel Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep @ Banty And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

within three weeks and apply for bail, the bail application be considered and disposed of in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773 after hearing the parties.

6. Till the aforesaid period of three weeks or until surrender before Court, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. However, the learned Trial Court shall proceed with the matter against the applicant in accordance with law.

7. With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 528 BNSS is finally disposed of. October 7, 2026 Vijay NA528 No. 43517 of 2026 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead