Allahabad High Court

NA529/4844/2026 of SMT. RINKU Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4844 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4844 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to decide the Criminal Case no. 43297 of 2025 (State vs. Umesh Yadav and other), arising out of Case Crime no. 370 of 2024, under Sections 323, 504, 506 IPc, Police Station Jhangaha, District Gorakhpur, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No. 3, Gorakhpur, expeditiously within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that cognizance upon the charge sheet has been taken on 06.08.2025 and summons issued to accused persons to face trial under the aforesaid sections. It is submitted that charges against the accused persons were framed on 20.12.2025, but till date, trial is still pending. Looking to the aforesaid circumstances, it is directed that trial pending before the concerned court be concluded expeditiously, as early as possible, in accordance with the provisions of Section 309 of the CrPC (Power to postpone or adjourn proceedings) corresponds to Section 346 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. The application is disposed of. October 7, 2026/Brijesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pramod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Smt. Rinku .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead