Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22922/2025 of BHAGWATI PRASAD TRIPATHI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22922 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Heard Mr. Bansh Raj Mishra, the learned counsel for petitioner, the learned A.G.A. for State respondents 1 to 5 and Mr. Ambikesh Kumar Sharma, the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22922 of 2025
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Bansh Raj Mishra, the learned counsel for petitioner, the learned A.G.A. for State respondents 1 to 5 and Mr. Ambikesh Kumar Sharma, the learned counsel representing respondents 6 to 12.
2. Perused the record.
3. Petitioner-Bhagwati Prasad Tripathi has approached this Court by means of present Criminal Misc. Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayer:- I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing respondent no.5 to lodge the First Information Report against the respondent no.6 to 12 under suitable sections of B.N.S., 2023 in accordance with law.
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing respondent no.4 to register the First Information Report against the respondent no.6 to 12 under suitable sections of B.N.S., 2023 and further to conclude the investigation.
III. Any other writ order or direction of suitable nature which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.
IV. To award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bansh Raj Mishra, Faya Nath Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ajay Tiwari, Ambikesh Kumar Sharma, G.A. Bhagwati Prasad Tripathi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. On the matter being taken up, the learned counsel for petitioner fairly submits that during pendency of present writ petition the petitioner has died and secondly FIR has also been registered.
5. In view of above, we are of the view that this writ petition is liable to be consigned to record.
6. It is accordingly consigned to record. October 7, 2026 Imtiyaz CRLP No. 22922 of 2025 2 (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad