Allahabad High Court

NA529/4806/2026 of ATAR SINGH Vs STATE OF U.P. on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4806 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4806 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to conclude and finalize the proceeding of Complaint Case no. 41023 of 2023 (Atar Singh vs. Mangeram and others), under Sections 323, 380, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Khatauli, District Muzaffar Nagar, pending before the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)-III, Muzaffar Nagar, within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that a complaint under the aforesaid sections was filed by the applicant before the learned court concerned. It is further submitted that, from the order sheet, it is evident that on 02.07.2026, the learned court concerned called for an enquiry report from the concerned police station, however, despite the passage of considerable time, the enquiry report has not been submitted by the police till date. It is further submitted that the applicant has approached the concerned police authorities for lodging of the FIR, but no FIR has been registered till date. Consequently, the matter has remained pending before the learned court concerned, and the applicant is being subjected to unnecessary hardship and delay. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is, therefore, prayed that this Court may graciously be pleased to direct the concerned police authority to submit the requisite enquiry report before the learned court concerned within a stipulated Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Laxman Prasad, Rajiv Sisodia Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Atar Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)

period and further direct the learned court concerned to proceed with and decide the complaint expeditiously, in accordance with law. Looking to the aforesaid circumstances, it is directed that matter pending before the concerned court be decided expeditiously, as early as possible, in accordance with law, preferably within six months, from the date of filing of certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. The application is disposed of. October 7, 2026 Brijesh NA529 No. 4806 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead