Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/10559/2026 of SMT POOJA AND 2 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10559 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Ambrish Kumar Kashyap, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Tiwari Abhishek Rajesh, learned counsel appearing for the informant and
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 10559 of 2026
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Ambrish Kumar Kashyap, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Tiwari Abhishek Rajesh, learned counsel appearing for the informant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicants in Case Crime No. 239 of 2026, under Sections 103(1), 61(2) BNS, Police Station Tappal, District Aligarh with a prayer to grant them anticipatory bail.
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this application and move an appropriate application seeking regular bail before the concerned Court. He prays that a direction may be given to the concerned Court to decide the bail application expeditiously.
4. Learned AGA has no objection to the said prayer.
5. On the prayer made, it is provided that in case the applicants appear before the concerned court and apply for bail within three weeks from today, their application for bail shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.
6. For a period of three weeks from today or till filing of regular bail application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ambrish Kumar Kashyap Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Tiwari Abhishek Rajesh Smt Pooja And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
7. It is made clear that no further time shall be granted to comply with this order.
8. With these observations, the application is disposed of. October 7, 2026 Lalit Shukla NABAIL No. 10559 of 2026 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad