Allahabad High Court
WRIC/40740/2026 of THE COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT MAA VINDHYAVASINI MAHILA AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40740 of 2026 Court No. - 38 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Heard Shri Dev Kant Trigunait, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Shesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - C No. - 40740 of 2026
Court No. - 38
HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Shri Dev Kant Trigunait, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Shesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State.
2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the quashing of the order dated 24.04.2025, by way of which the name of the petitioner's Institution for receiving the grant-in-aid recognition, has been rejected.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner though has raised various arguments assailing the impugned order, but he admits that some of the conditions which have been enumerated in the impugned order, as the ground for rejection, is currently not being met by the petitioner's Institution; but the said requirement shall be fulfilled by the Institution very soon.
4. In view of the aforesaid, after some argument, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and, as and when the conditions prescribed under the G.O. dated 07.02.2014 are met, he may be permitted to again apply seeking the benefit of grant-in-aid, to which the learned Standing Counsel has not raised any objection.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner that, as and when the Institution meets the conditions enumerated in the G.O. dated 07.02.2014, he may make a fresh application seeking the benefit of grant-in-aid; and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dev Kant Trigunait Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shesh Kumar Srivastava The Committee Of Management Maa Vindhyavasini Mahila And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
the Authorities concerned shall accord fresh consideration to the same, without being influenced with the impugned order dated 24.04.2025. October 7, 2026 Sumit K. WRIC No. 40740 of 2026 2 (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad