Allahabad High Court

NA529/4978/2026 of SURAJ RAJBHAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4978 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4978 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to decide the Criminal Case no. 512 of 2020 (State vs. Suraj Rajbhar and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 192 of 2019, under Sections 498A, 377, 323, 506 IPC, Police Station Sarailakhansi, District Mau, pending before the court of learned Judicial Magistrate FTC, District Mau, within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that charge sheet has been submitted on 26.10.2019, whereupon cognizance has been taken on 27.10.2020 and summons issued to accused person to face trial under the aforesaid sections. Thereafter, charges were framed against the accused on 11.02.2025 by the court concerned. It is next submitted that more than one and a half year has been passed after framing of charge, but till date no witness has been examined by the concerned court. Looking to the aforesaid circumstances, it is directed that trial pending before the concerned court be concluded expeditiously, as early as possible, within one year, from the date of filing of certified copy of this order, in accordance with the provisions of Section 309 of the CrPC (Power to postpone or adjourn proceedings) corresponds to Section 346 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shubham Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Suraj Rajbhar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

no legal impediment. The application is disposed of. October 7, 2026 Brijesh NA529 No. 4978 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead