Allahabad High Court
CRLP/9940/2025 of KISHAN PAL AND 12 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9940 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Heard Mr. Subhash Chandra Singh, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents 1 and 2. 2. Perused the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9940 of 2025
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Subhash Chandra Singh, the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents 1 and 2.
2. Perused the record.
3. Petitioners Kishan Pal and twelve others have approached this court by means of present criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 16.03.2025 lodged by first informant-respondent no.3 Raju @ Rajveer and registered as Case Crime No. 0042 of 2025, under Sections 191 (2), 191 (3), 190, 109 (1), 352, 351 (3), 115(2), 134, 333 of B.N.S., Police Station Patwai, District Rampur.
4. On the matter being taken up, learned AGA representing State respondents submits that after completion of statutory investigation of concerned case crime number arising out of the impugned FIR, investigating officer has submitted the charge sheet/police report in terms of Section 173 (2) CrPC / 193 (3) BNSS. In all probability, cognizance must have been taken upon aforementioned charge sheet by the jurisdictional Magistrate.
5. In view of above, we are of the view that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
6. It is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 7, 2026 AKT Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Subhash Chandra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Kishan Pal And 12 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad