Allahabad High Court
A227/14125/2026 of PRITI Vs LALMUNI AND 2 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14125 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i. Issue a suitable order or direction directing the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14125 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i. Issue a suitable order or direction directing the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, F.T.C., Court No.1, Mau to decide the Civil Misc. Appeal No.45 of 2025 (Priti Vs. Lalmuni), under Order 43 Rule 1 of C.P.C. arising out of Original Suit No.187 of 2024 (Smt. Lalmuni Vs. Priti) within stipulated period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. It is contended that misc. civil appeal filed by the plaintiff along with application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the misc. appeal filed under Order 39 Rule 1 (r) CPC.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, at this stage, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, with a direction upon Court below to decide Misc. Civil Appeal No.45 of 2025, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. October 7, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amrita Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Priti .....Petitioner(s) Lalmuni And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad