Allahabad High Court

NA529/4980/2026 of SMT NAYASA BANO Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4980 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4980 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to decide the Criminal Case No. 487 of 2024 (State vs. Aashif and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 0090 of 2024, under Sections 498A, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, pending before the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)/FTC-I, Aligarh, expeditiously within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the charge-sheet was filed on 13.08.2024, whereupon cognizance was taken on 05.10.2024 and summons were issued to the accused persons. It is further submitted that, thereafter, the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the applicant surrendered before the learned trial court and were granted bail on 29.07.2025. The husband of the applicant also surrendered before the learned trial court on 27.04.2026 and was granted interim bail. It is further submitted that, as of date, the trial in the aforesaid case is still pending. Considering the fact that the proceedings of the subject case has remained pending since 2024, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary or long Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Vijay Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt Nayasa Bano .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)

adjournments to either of the parties, preferably within a period of one and half years, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. The application is disposed of. October 7, 2026 Brijesh NA529 No. 4980 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead