Allahabad High Court

NA529/4845/2026 of RAM RAJ Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4845 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4845 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to expedite and conclude the trial of Complaint Case No. 168 of 2024 (Special Sessions Trial No. 22 of 2025) (State vs. Rajdhar Ojha and others), arising out of complaint dated 05.07.2024, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 504, 506, 307 IPC and Section 3(2)(Va) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Handia, Prayagraj pending before the court of learned Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj, expeditiously within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that by order dated 24.01.2025, the learned court concerned summoned Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 5 to face trial for the offences under the aforesaid sections. Despite repeated summons and notices issued by the learned court concerned, Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 5 have failed to appear before the court and, consequently, the proceedings have not progressed. It is further submitted that the criminal appeal preferred by Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 4 against the said order was dismissed by this Court. Thereafter, vide order dated 12.11.2025, the learned trial court issued bailable warrants of Rs. 20,000/- each against Opposite Party Nos. 2 to 4. Learned counsel submits that the trial has remained pending for more than two years and, despite the passage of considerable time, the proceedings have not reached their Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Adwitiya Prakash Tiwari, Anshuman Singh, Vinay Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Raj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s)

conclusion. It is, therefore, prayed that this Court may be pleased to direct the learned trial court to make all possible endeavours to proceed with and conclude the trial expeditiously. Considering the fact that the proceedings of the subject case has remained pending since 2024, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, preferably within a period of one and half years, from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. The application is disposed of. October 7, 2026 Brijesh NA529 No. 4845 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead