Allahabad High Court

NA528/37167/2026 of AJAY Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37167 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Shri Mohammad Abid Ali, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Puspraj Singh, learned brief holder for the State and Shri Shan Mohd, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37167 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Shri Mohammad Abid Ali, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Puspraj Singh, learned brief holder for the State and Shri Shan Mohd, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 are present. The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 577 of 2025, arising out of case crime No. 274 of 2023, under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n), I.P.C. and Section 5(L)/6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Police Station- Bhojipura, District Bareilly as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 28.7.2023, pending in the court of Special Judge (POCSO Act)/Additional Sessions Judge, Bareilly. Learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 pointed out that statements of two fact witnesses have been recorded before the trial court and the trial is at advance stage. Learned A.G.A. also pointed out that the trial is at advance stage. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and the same may be dismissed as not pressed. The instant application is dismissed as not pressed accordingly. Office shall return the certified copy of the documents to the learned counsel for the applicant, after retaining a xerox of the same. October 7, 2026 T. Sinha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Abid Ali Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shan Md, Tariq Nehal Ansari (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Ajay .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead