Allahabad High Court

WRIC/40548/2026 of MOHD AMEEN Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 40548 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard Sri R.S.Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. Sujata Choudhary, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 2 & 3. 2. By means of this petition filed

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - C No. - 40548 of 2026

Court No. - 1

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.

HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri R.S.Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. Sujata Choudhary, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 2 & 3.

2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for disposal of his pending application for fresh passport with the concerned Regional Passport Officer.

3. Per contra it is submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that the petitioner has been issued with the show cause notice to explain about the following criminal case which is pending against him:

(i) case crime no. 1391 of 2025 under Section 138 (1) (b) of Indian Electricity Act, P.S. Handiya, District Prayagraj.

4. In our considered view, petitioner should, in the first instance, follow the guidelines and procedures laid down in the judgment of this Court in the case of Rahimuddin vs. Union of India & Another (Neutral Citation No. – 2025:AHC:181505-DB) and recently in the case of Wajiruddin Khan v. Union of India & 2 Others, (Neutral Citation No. – 2026:AHC:138176-DB) and thereafter, the Regional Passport Officer shall dispose of the application of the petitioner in accordance with guidelines laid down in the aforesaid judgments.

5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. October 7, 2026 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raghavendra Sharan Tiwari, Shwetank Priy Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Sujata Choudhary (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Mohd Ameen .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead