Allahabad High Court
NABAIL/10317/2025 of DANISH Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10317 of 2025 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. None appeared on behalf of informant even in the revised call though Sri Aditya Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No.
- 10317 of 2025
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None appeared on behalf of informant even in the revised call though Sri Aditya Prasad Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State is present.
2. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 59 of 2020, under Sections 363, 366, 342, 376-D, 506, 120B of I.P.C. and under Sections 5/6, 16/17 of POCSO Act, Police Station - Lisari Gate, District Meerut, with a prayer to grant him anticipatory bail.
3. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that the applicant filed an Application U/S 482 Cr.P.C. No. 13581 of 2021, wherein proceedings of this Court was stayed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The aforesaid application is still pending. Since the proceedings has been stayed against the applicant, therefore, he has no apprehension of his arrest, therefore, the present application is not maintainable at this stage.
4. On being confronted with this fact, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present application be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file an appropriate application, if so required.
5. With the aforesaid liberty, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shyam Murari Upadhyay Danish .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
7. Registrar (Compliance) is directed to send a copy of this order to the court concerned for necessary compliance. October 7, 2026 A.P. Pandey NABAIL No. 10317 of 2025 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad