Allahabad High Court
A227/14208/2026 of RAM DULAR Vs RAJ KUMAR YADAV on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14208 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is a plaintiff's petition. 2. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "( a ) Issue an order or direction directing learned trial court (learned Civil
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14208 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is a plaintiff's petition.
2. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "(a) Issue an order or direction directing learned trial court (learned Civil Judge, (Junior Division), City, Azamgarh), to make disposal of application 7ga2 (for interim order) and 30ka2 (Amendment application) in Suit No. 1139/2025 Ram Dular versus Raj Kumar, expeditiously within a stipulated period."
3. It is contended that in the suit filed by the plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction 7C2 was moved along with an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amending the plaint. The sole prayer made is for expediting both the applications.
4. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the respondent, at this admission stage, the court below is hereby directed to proceed with the application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC and decide the same within a period of one month and thereafter, proceed to decide the 7C2 application within next one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 7, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manik Chandra Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) :
(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ram Dular .....Petitioner(s) Raj Kumar Yadav .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad