Allahabad High Court

WRIA/16538/2026 of UMASHAKAR MISHRA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16538 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "I. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondents for making payments of arrear of leave

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 16538 of 2026

Court No. - 33

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. This petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "I. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondents for making payments of arrear of leave encashment of 300 days alongwith appropriate interest as early as possible within 30 days.

II. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus for revising the pension of the petitioner on the basis of pay fixing at the rate of Rs 53600 on the promotional post, Commercial Tax Officer, as early as possible within a month."

2. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner has already moved a representation in this regard before the respondent, which is pending consideration.

3. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that as petitioner has already represented, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate that respondent be directed to consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with law.

4. In view of these facts, respondent No. 3 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Babu Ram Yadav, Deepak Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Umashakar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)

5. It is made clear that this court has not examined the matter on merits and the order shall be passed strictly in accordance with law.

6. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. October 7, 2026 Nitika Sri. WRIA No. 16538 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead