CMRAD/147/2025 of RITU DWIVEDI Vs SANTOSH KUMAR DWIVEDI AND ANOTHER on 6 October 2026

1. None appears on behalf of review applicant.

2. Paragraph 2 from our earlier order dated 27th February, 2026 is reproduced below.

2. Review applicant was respondent no. 4 in the writ petition. Reproduced below are paragraphs-2 and 3 from our order dated 10th February, 2026. "2. Mr. Ram Sajiwan Mishra, learned advocate appears on behalf of writ petitioners. He submits, pursuant to disposal order dated 14th August, 2025, the District Magistrate passed order, in compliance of which his client was put in possession. Mr. Pandey submits, against order passed by the District Magistrate his client has filed writ petition. Mr. Raj Mohan Upadhyay, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears on behalf of State.

3. Review applicant has opportunity to disclose subsequent events by affidavit. It is to be filed by 23rd February, 2026." Mr. Mishra submits, the review has become infructuous. That may be so. Since review applicant goes unrepresented and the affidavit disclosing subsequent events has not been filed, writ petitioners are at liberty to disclose the subsequent events by affidavit, to be accepted on adjourned date upon advance copy served. We make it clear, continued absence of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vageesh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ram Sajiwan Mishra Ritu Dwivedi .....Applicant(s) Santosh Kumar Dwivedi And Another .....Opposite Party(s)

review applicant will cause dismissal of the application."

3. Mr. Satyam Mishra, learned advocate appears for writ petitioner.

4. The delayed, therefore defective review application is dismissed. October 7, 2026 Shiv CMRAD No. 147 of 2025 2

(Arindam Sinha,J.)

(Prashant Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIV KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad