Allahabad High Court
NA529/5006/2026 of SMT. JYOTSANA TYAGI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 5006 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. 2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 5006 of 2026
Court No. - 82
HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record.
2. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned for early disposal of Case No. 773 of 2024 (Smt. Jyotsana Tyagi vs. Saurabh Tyagi and ors.), under Sections- 12, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005(D.V. Act), pending before the court of Civil Judge (J.D.), F.T.C., Ghaziabad.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the present case, accused persons were summoned on 26.3.2025 and till date, opposite parties did not file written statement in the matter and almost one and half years have already passed.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the court concerned is directed to make all endeavours to decide the aforesaid case, keeping in view the mandate and law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of nine months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to the parties, if there is no other legal impediment.
5. With the aforesaid observations, the instant application is finally disposed of. October 7, 2026 KK Patel Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ayushi Pandey, Rohan Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Smt. Jyotsana Tyagi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHN KANT PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad