Allahabad High Court
A227/14221/2026 of ASHOK KUMAR YADAV Vs DWARIKA AND 32 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14221 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i. Issue an appropriate Order or Direction calling for the records and directing the Court of Additional District
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14221 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i. Issue an appropriate Order or Direction calling for the records and directing the Court of Additional District and Session Judge, F.T.C.-I, Kushinagar at Padrauna to decide the Civil Revision No. 26 of 2021 Ashok Yadav and others vs. Dwarika and others U/s 115 C.P.C. filed by the plaintiff/petitioner on the next date fixed or within the time stipulated by the Hon'ble Court."
2. It is contended that plaintiff-petitioner had moved an application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC which was rejected. Against which, a civil revision no. 26 of 2021 has been filed, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made is for expeditious disposal of the said civil revision.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the respondents, at this admission stage, the court below is hereby directed to proceed with the aforesaid civil revision no. 26 of 2021 and decide the same within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 7, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Sut, Vinay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ashok Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Dwarika And 32 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad