Allahabad High Court
BAIL/35801/2026 of GOLU YADAV @ CHANDRIKA PRASAD Vs STATE OF U.P. on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35801 of 2026 Court No. - 65 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Heard Sri Manvendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Shatruhan Yadav, learned AGA for the State. 2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35801 of 2026
Court No. - 65
HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Sri Manvendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Shatruhan Yadav, learned AGA for the State.
2. The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 110 of 2026, under Sections 103(1), 352, 3(5) BNS, Police Station Pahari, District Chitrakoot during pendency of the trial.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits, however, applicant is named in the FIR but according to the FIR co-accused Aman Patel was the prime accused who inflicted knife injuries to the deceased.
4. He further submits, applicant is not having any criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 27.05.2026.
5. Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the argument on facts advanced by learned counsel for the applicant.
6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case.
7. However, applicant is named in the FIR but role of causing knife injuries has been assigned to co-accused Aman Patel and therefore co-accused Aman Patel appears to be prime accused.
8. Further, applicant is not having any criminal history and in the present matter he is in jail since 27.05.2026.
9. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the case discussed Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manvendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Golu Yadav @ Chandrika Prasad .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
above, in my view, applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
10. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the instant bail application is allowed.
11. Let the applicant - Golu Yadav @ Chandrika Prasad be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal and anti-social activity.
12. In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution will be at liberty to move an application before this Court for cancellation of the bail of the applicant.
13. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. October 7, 2026 AK Pandey BAIL No. 35801 of 2026 2 (Sameer Jain,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad