Allahabad High Court

NA529/4965/2026 of VEERPAL SINGH JADON Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4965 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4965 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned for expeditious disposal of Complaint No. 25513 of 2025 (Veerpal Singh Jadaon vs. Keshav Singh @ Bunty Dhakad), pending before the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 12, Agra. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that present case has been instituted on 25.11.2025. Thereafter, taking cognizance in the said case, the court concerned has passed the summoning order on 11.3.2026 against the opposite party no. 2. Bailable warrants have been issued against the opposite party no. 2 on 15.6.2026. It is submitted that trial of the instant case is being pending at the stage of evidence. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case and conclude the trial in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, as per the provision of Section 143(3) of the N.I. Act, if there is no other legal impediment. However, it is expected that both the parties shall cooperate with the trial. October 7, 2026 Brijesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ansar Haider Rizvi, Rajesh Bhaskar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Veerpal Singh Jadon .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead