Allahabad High Court

WPIL/2388/2026 of SATYAPRAKASH SHARMA Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2388 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent State. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha. 2. The

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2388 of 2026

Court No. - 51

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondent State. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha.

2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent nos.2 to 5 to remove the illegal encroachment made by encroachers over Plot No.122 area 0.1380 hectare, recorded as Khad Ka Gaddha in the relevant revenue records, relating to Village Pipal Gaon, Tehsil Moradabad, District Moradabad.

3. Today when the case was taken up, learned Standing Counsel has placed before the Court the instructions dated 3.10.2026 sent by Deputy District Magistrate, Sadar, District Moradabad, which is taken on record.

4. Perusal of the aforesaid instructions shows that on the basis of report of Lekhpal dated 19.9.2026, Case No. T202613540130260 has been registered against the respondent no.6 under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending consideration, in which 15.10.2026 is the next date fixed.

5. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.4 to decide the aforesaid pending case, in accordance with law, after hearing the parties concerned, within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order. October 7, 2026 Anil Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mayank Prakash Rawat, Surendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey, C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) Satyaprakash Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead