Allahabad High Court

WPIL/2230/2026 of PREM CHAND Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2230 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri P. K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Sri R. P. Shukla, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2230 of 2026

Court No. - 51

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Sri P. K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. Sri R. P. Shukla, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of respondent Gaon Sabha.

2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to remove the illegal encroachment made by encroachers over plot no. 115, situated in Village Tarwan, Tahsil Sadar, District Mau.

3. By the order of this Court, dated 18.09.2026, instruction was sought from the learned Standing Counsel. Today, when the case was taken up, instruction dated 01.10.2026, sent by Tahsildar, Sadar, Mau has been placed before the Court, which is taken on record.

4. Perusal of aforesaid instruction shows that three cases bearing nos. T201815510100322, T201815510100323 and T201815510100321 were registered against the encroachers under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which were decided by the order dated 08.06.2018, directing their eviction. The opposite party in Case No. T201815510100322 had removed his offending construction, however, the opposite parties of the other two cases i.e. T201815510100323 & T201815510100321 have filed restoration application, which are pending consideration before the Tahsildar, Sadar, Mau in which 09.10.2026 is the next date fixed.

5. In view of the fact that due to pendency of restoration application, the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pavan Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Prem Chand .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s)

implementation of the order dated 08.06.2018 has not been carried out, therefore, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the Tahsildar, Sadar, Mau to hear and decide the restoration applications filed in the abovementioned two cases, pending before him, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order and to ensure that proceedings under Section 67 of the Code initiated against the encroachers are brought to its logical end, if there is no other legal impediment. October 7, 2026 Ashok Kr. WPIL No. 2230 of 2026 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead