Allahabad High Court
BAIL/34694/2026 of TEEKARAM Vs STATE OF U.P. on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34694 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Sri Varinder Singh, learned counsel for the applicant has hands up supplementary affidavit explaining criminal history, the same is taken on record. 1A. Heard Sri Singh,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34694 of 2026
Court No. - 69
HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Sri Varinder Singh, learned counsel for the applicant has hands up supplementary affidavit explaining criminal history, the same is taken on record. 1A. Heard Sri Singh, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Teekaram to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 322 of 2026, under Sections 317(2), 317(5), 112(2), 318(4), 317(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 3(5) of BNS, P.S.- Devaraniya, District- Bareilly during the pendency of trial.
3. It is the contention of learned counsel for accused applicant that on 4.8.2026 the police has arrested three accused, namely, Rohit Govind and Ashok from the spot. Later on at the instance of the above three accused subsequent raid has been carried by the police in which the accused/applicant has been arrested and nine stolen motorcycles were recovered by the police. The arrest and recovery has been made in absence of the independent witnesses. The accused applicant has criminal history of two cases, wherein in both the cases, he is in jail. The investigation is continuing. He is co-operating in the investigation. The applicant is languishing in jail since 4.8.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail.
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Varinder Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Teekaram .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Considering that the arrest and recovery has been made in absence of the independent witnesses, the accused applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685].
9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. October 7, 2026 Abhishek Sri. BAIL No. 34694 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK RANJAN SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad