Allahabad High Court
CRLP/11210/2024 of RANJEET KUMAR GUPRA AND 6 OTHERS Vs State of UP AND 2 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11210 of 2024 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. 2. Heard Mr. Shubham Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Rajarshi Gupta, learned counsel for petitioners and
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11210 of 2024
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out in the revised list.
2. Heard Mr. Shubham Pandey, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Rajarshi Gupta, learned counsel for petitioners and learned AGA representing state respondents state respondents 1 and 2.
3. Perused the record.
4. Petitioners - Ranjeet Kumar Gupta and 6 others have approached this court by way of the present Criminal Misce. Writ Petition challenging the FIR dated 17.6.2024 lodged by first informant respondent 3, Smt. Mamta Sharma and registered as Case Crime No. 0181 of 2024, under Sections 377, 498-A, 504, 506 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Nagra, District Ballia.
5. On the matter being taken up, learned counsel for petitioners fairly submits that during pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer upon completion of statutory investigation of aforementioned Case Crime Number, in terms of Chapter XII CrPC, has submitted the final report / police report dated 13.1.2026 in terms of Section 173(2) CrPC. As such, no cause of action now survives to petitioners to press the present writ petition.
6. On the above premise, it is submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that instant writ petition has now been rendered infructuous.
7. Learned AGA representing state respondents 1 and 2 does not oppose the submission made by the learned counsel for petitioners.
8. In view of above, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed as having Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aryan Krishna, Rajrshi Gupta, Rizwan Ahamad, Shyam Krishna Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Meraj Khan Ranjeet Kumar Gupra And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
rendered infructuous.
9. It is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
10. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. October 7, 2026 safi CRLP No. 11210 of 2024 2 (Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad