Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22681/2026 of AMIT ATTRI Vs RAJYA UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22681 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. A writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22681 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. A writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the impugned first information report dated 11.07.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 361 of 2026, under Sections 318(2), 318(4) BNS, Police Station Tappal, District Aligarh.
ii. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned first information report dated 11.07.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 361 of 2026, under Sections 318(2), 318(4) BNS, Police Station Tappal, District Aligarh."
2. Mr. Vijay Rathi, learned State Law Officer submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of the statutory investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted charge sheet on 17.09.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statement given by the learned AGA, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before appropriate forum.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Mishra, Shiv Sharan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Amit Attri .....Petitioner(s) Rajya Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
for the State-respondents.
5. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA and the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the fact that after investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted the charge sheet on 17.09.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned, we do not find any reason to keep the matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. October 7, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 22681 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad