Allahabad High Court

NA529/4808/2026 of MO. ADIL KHAN Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4808 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4808 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to expedite the trial of Sessions Case no. 64 of 2018 (State vs. Mahfooz and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 522 of 2014, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452 IPC, Police Station Dankaur, District Gautam Buddha Nagar, pending before the court of learned Additional District Judge/F.T.C.-I, Gautam Buddha Nagar, within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that charge sheet in the aforesaid case has been submitted on 29.06.2015. It is submitted that during the pendency of trial of the present case, the applicant no. 1, who was the complainant of present case was died and on his behalf his legal heir was substituted on 07.08.2024 and this fact was very well proved from the perusal of the order sheet itself. In fact the applicant is appearing each and every date fixed by the court concerned. It is lastly submitted that after lapse of eight years, the trial of present case is yet not been completed. It is submitted that since then, the matter is pending before the court concerned. Looking to the aforesaid circumstances, it is directed that trial pending before the concerned court be concluded expeditiously, as early as possible, within one year, from the date of filing of certified copy of this order, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mo. Adil Khan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

The application is disposed of. October 7, 2026 Brijesh NA529 No. 4808 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead