Allahabad High Court

NA528/41489/2026 of LAKHAN TOMAR Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41489 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Saroj Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Alok Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41489 of 2026 Court No. - 75 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Saroj Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Alok Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita has been filed to quash the order dated 05.09.2026 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/ Fast Track Court, Court No. 1, Aligarh in Session Trial No. 3037 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 262 of 2023, under Sections 376, 506 of I.P.C. and Section 67-A and 66 of Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008, Police Station- Delhi Gate, District- Aligarh, whereby an application under Section 311 of Cr.P.C. filed by the prosecution has been allowed. Learned A.G.A. pointed out that the witness (sister of the victim) who filed an affidavit under Section 65-B of Indian Evidence Act) has been called for examination. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file an appropriate application/ proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Certified copy of the order may be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining a xerox thereof. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. October 7, 2026 Ishan Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saroj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Lakhan Tomar .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ISHAN JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead