Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22740/2026 of MOHD. IBRAHIM SIDDIQUI Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22740 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. A writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22740 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. A writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondents to ensure fair, impartial and expeditious investigation in Case Crime No.247 of 2026, under Sections 137(2), 87 of BNS, Police Station Kant, District Shahjahanpur, strictly in accordance with law.
ii. A writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to transfer the investigation of the said Case Crime No. 247 of 2026 from the present Investigating Officer and police station to any other Police Station or District investigating unit, under supervision of the Superintendent of Police/higher authority."
2. Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, learned AGA submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of the statutory investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted final report on 19.07.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statement given by the learned AGA, this writ petition may be disposed of.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents.
5. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar, Saurabh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mohd. Ibrahim Siddiqui .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the fact that after investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted the final report on 19.07.2026 and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned, therefore, nothing left in this petition for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. October 7, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 22740 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad