Central Government Industrial Tribunal
EPF matters order dated 19.09.2025 CGIT-1 Delhi except item no. 1 & 7 of the cause list which are uploaded separately on 19 September 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
D-1/36/2024 M/s Jetking Skill Development Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi East.
Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant.
Sh. Sunil Ranjan, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-19.09.2025 The AR present for the respondent submitted that the main counsel Sh. Narender Kumar has gone to Meerut due to some urgent work and is unable to attend the hearing today. Perusal of the record reveals that this tribunal vide order dated 15.04.2025 had directed the Enforcement Officer (E.O.) who had submitted the report in this matter be remain present on the next date of hearing to assist this tribunal. Put up the matter on 07.11.2025 for consideration of the stay application. Let the E.O. be remain present on the next date. In the meanwhile, interim orders to continue till next date of hearing.
BEFORE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM LABOUR COURT, DELHI
D-1/17/2025 M/s Delhi Jan Sudhar Samiti vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi East.
Present: Sh. Prakash Kumar, Ld. Counsel for the Appellant. Sh. K.K. Jha, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Sunil Ranjan, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-19.09.2025 Ld. Counsel for the respondent has filed reply to the misc. application filed for seeking stay as well as to the main appeal, however, he seeks more time to file the reply to the delay condonation application. In the interest of justice, prayer to grant more time is allowed. Put up on 07.11.2025 for filing of reply to the delay condonation application as well as consideration of the same.
639(4)2013 M/s Ace Laboratories Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi.
Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. S.N. Mahanta, Ld. Counsel & Sh. Sunil Ranjan, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-19.09.2025 After hearing the ld. Counsel for Respondent it is found that the status of claim lodged before Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench) has not been obtained. In view of the above, this file is consigned to the record room sine die. As and when respondent is able to furnish the status, the file be revived by moving an appropriate application.
1024(4)2014 M/s A N Traders vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi.
Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Satpal Singh, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
Order dated-19.09.2025 As none is present on behalf of the appellant, put up the matter on 07.11.2025 for final arguments. Ld. Counsel for the appellant be informed about the next date of hearing through email.
617(4)2015 M/s Reliance Engineering and Electrical Corp. vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi (North).
Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Mahendra Meena, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-19.09.2025 Called up several times. None appeared on behalf of the appellant, however, A/R for the respondent remain present throughout the calls. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution by and on behalf of the appellant. Office is directed to consign the record to the record room.
D-1/23/2022 M/s Walter Bushnell Life Care Pvt. Ltd. vs. APFC/RPFC Delhi Central.
Present: None for the Appellant. Sh. Rahul, A/R for the Respondent.
Order dated-19.09.2025 Ld. Counsel for both the parties are not present, put up the matter on 13.11.2025. Ld. Counsel for the appellant be informed about the next date of hearing through email.