Allahabad High Court
CRLP/9761/2025 of KUMARI ARCHANA AND 4 OTHERS Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9761 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J. 1. Case called out in the revised list. 2. Even though the names of Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh and Mr. Gyanendra Tripathi are duly published in the cause
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9761 of 2025
Court No. - 47
HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J.
HON'BLE JAI KRISHNA UPADHYAY, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Case called out in the revised list.
2. Even though the names of Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh and Mr. Gyanendra Tripathi are duly published in the cause list as counsel for the petitioners, but neither they nor anyone on their behalf is present to press the present writ petition, even in revised call.
3. Learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents 1 and 2 is present.
4. Perused the record.
5. On the matter being taken up, the learned A.G.A. representing State respondents submits that upon completion of statutory investigation of concerned case crime number arising out of the impugned FIR, investigating officer has submitted the charge sheet/police report dated 12.05.2025 in terms of Section 193 (3) BNSS. In view of above, learned AGA submits that no cause of action now survives to petitioner to press the present petition.
6. In view of the above, we are of the considered opinion that cognizance in terms of Section 210 BNSS must have been taken by the jurisdictional Magistrate/court concerned upon aforesaid mentioned charge sheet. As such, by efflux Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhay Kumar Singh, Gyanendra Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Amrendra Singh, G.A. Kumari Archana And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
of time, the present writ petition may have been rendered infructuous.
7. It is, accordingly, dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
8. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. October 7,
AKT CRLP No. 9761 of 2025
(Jai Krishna Upadhyay,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad