Allahabad High Court
WRIA/16401/2026 of SMT. NEELAM CHANDRA Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16401 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "I. Issue a
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 16401 of 2026
Court No. - 33
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of CERTIORARI quashing the impugned attachment/transfer order no. अ०नि० / अधि०/2026/5748-54 dated 29.08.2026 issued by respondent no.3 (annexure no. 5), and the consequential relieving order no. सी०एम०एस० अधि०/2026-27/6259-60 dated 31.08.2026 issued by respondent no. 4 (annexure no. 6).
II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue performing her duties as nursing officer at district joint hospital, Amroha, district amroha, with full salary and service benefits.
III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing respondent no.3 to decide the petitioner's representation dated 01.09.2026 (annexure по. sympathetically within a time-bound period. 7)."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is seeking quashing the impugned attachment/transfer order no. अ०नि० / अधि० /2026/5748-54 dated 29.08.2026. In this regard, the petitioner has moved a representation/application which is pending consideration. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Aman Patel, Neeraj Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Neelam Chandra .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending and it would be appropriate to direct the respondent no. 3 to decide the representation/application of the petitioner within a time frame as fixed by this Court.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 3 to consider and decide the aforementioned representation/application of the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 7, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 16401 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad