Allahabad High Court

NA529/4433/2026 of DR. PALAK PUSHP Vs STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4433 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4433 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to expedite the Execution Application No. 275 of 2025 (Dr. Palak Pushp vs. Dr. Sripati Tripathi), under Section 147 BNSS, District Gorakhpur, pending before the court of learned Additional Family Court-II, Gorakhpur, within stipulated period. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant had instituted an application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance, which was decided by the learned court concerned vide order dated 05.02.2025. It is further submitted that, thereafter, the applicant moved an execution application for enforcement of the said order, which was entertained by the learned court concerned and summons were issued to opposite party no. 2. It is next submitted that the applicant has been regularly appearing before the learned court concerned on each and every date fixed, however, opposite party no. 2 has deliberately been avoiding appearance before the court concerned and has failed to participate in the proceedings. It is further submitted that several dates have already been fixed in the execution proceedings, but despite the passage of considerable time, the said execution application has not yet been decided. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Singh, Satyendra Kumar Dwivedi, Vani Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dr. Palak Pushp .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

Considering the above facts and circumstances without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to expedite the Execution Application No. 275 of 2025, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to the parties as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment. October 7, 2026 Brijesh NA529 No. 4433 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead