Allahabad High Court
CRLP/22807/2026 of AFTAB ALAM Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 10 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22807 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22807 of 2026
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:- "i. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.2/Superintendent of Police, District Jaunpur to transfer the present matter from Police Station Mungrabadshahpur, District Jaunpur to other police station or any Investigating Agency like CB CID and conduct the investigation in the present matter fairly i.e. First Information Report dated 14.09.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 227 of 2025, under Section 103(1) BNS, 2023, P.S. Mungra Badshahpur, District Jaunpur lodged by the petitioner against the unknown persons.
ii. to issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
2. Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned AGA-I submitted and apprised the Court that after completion of the statutory investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted charge sheet and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the statement given by the learned AGA, this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to avail appropriate remedy before appropriate forum. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Md Zakir Husain, Nuruddin Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Aftab Alam .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 10 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing for the State-respondents.
5. Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned AGA and the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the fact that after investigation, the Investigating Officer has submitted the charge sheet and the same was also forwarded to the court concerned, we do not find any reason to keep the matter pending for further adjudication.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed. October 7, 2026 Prajapati RK CRLP No. 22807 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad