Allahabad High Court
A227/14154/2026 of VINOD KUMAR MAURYA AND 2 OTHERS Vs MOHAMMAD JAHANGIR on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14154 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is a defendants' petition. 2. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i. to set-aside the impugned orders dated 11.08.2026 and 25.08.2026 (Annexure
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14154 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is a defendants' petition.
2. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i. to set-aside the impugned orders dated 11.08.2026 and 25.08.2026 (Annexure no. 1) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Pilibhit in Misc. Case no. 132 of 2026; Mohammad Jahangir Vs. Vinod Kumar Maurya and others; ii- to issue a direction whereby commanding the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pilibhit to adjudicate the objections dated 10.09.2026 (Annexure no. 11) filed by the petitioner in Misc. Case no. 132 of 2026; Mohammad Jahangir Vs. Vinod Kumar Maurya and others, expeditiously, within a fixed time frame as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to fix, without granting unnecessary adjournments to the plaintiff/respondent."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not pressing the first prayer made in the writ petition and is only confining to the second relief. According to the petitioner's counsel, in the suit filed by the plaintiff- respondent, a temporary injunction was granted, and thereafter an application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC was moved, against which objections has been filed by the petitioner, which are pending consideration. The sole prayer made is for expeditious disposal of the same. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Apoorva Bhatt, Arpit Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) :
Vinod Kumar Maurya And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Mohammad Jahangir .....Respondent(s)
4. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the respondent, at this admission stage, the court below is hereby directed to proceed with the application filed under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC along with the objections filed by the defendants and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 7, 2026 A. V. Singh A227 No. 14154 of 2026 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad