Allahabad High Court

NA529/4857/2026 of SMT. PRATIBHA TRIPATHI Vs STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4857 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4857 of 2026 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State as also perused the record. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed seeking direction to the court concerned to conclude the trial of Complaint Case No. 235 of 2024 (Pratibha Tripathi vs. Vikalp Tripathi), under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police station Mahila Thana, District Gautam Buddha Nagar, pending before the court of learned Civil Judge (J.D.), FTC-II, Gautam Buddha Nagar, expeditiously within stipulated period. It is submitted that the present complaint was instituted by the applicant on 26.02.2024. Thereafter, the statement of the applicant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. was recorded on 01.04.2024. The statements of the other witnesses under Section 202 Cr.P.C. were subsequently recorded on 02.01.2025 and 08.01.2025, respectively. Thereafter, the learned court concerned, upon consideration of the material on record, summoned opposite party no. 2 vide order dated 26.06.2025. It is further submitted that the aforesaid complaint case has remained pending before the learned court concerned since 26.02.2024. Looking to the aforesaid circumstances, it is directed that trial pending before the concerned court be concluded expeditiously, as early as possible, in accordance law, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deepak Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Pratibha Tripathi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s)

The application is disposed of. October 7, 2026 Brijesh NA529 No. 4857 of 2026 2 (Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- BRIJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead