Allahabad High Court

WRIA/16416/2026 of JITENDRA PAL SINGH Vs THE STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16416 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: " a ) Issue, a

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 16416 of 2026

Court No. - 33

HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "a) Issue, a writ, in the nature of Certiorari, Quashing the Impugned Transfer Order dated 03/09/2026, Passed by the Respondent No. 5, and as well as Consequential Relieving Order dated 24/09/2026 Passed by the Respondent No. 6 (enclosed as Annexure-1 & 2) to this writ petition.

b) Issue, a writ order or direction, in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent Authorities, Permitting the Petitioner to continue at his Present Place of Posting at Local intelligence Unit (LIU) Aligarh District Aligarh or to Accommodate the Petitioner at District Mathura, Gautam Budh Nagar, Ghaziabad, Bulandshahar, Hapur, or District Badaun in Local Intelligence Unit, (LIU) or Special Branch in Local Intelligence Unit."

3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been transferred by the order impugned though earlier the petitioner was transferred on compassionate ground in the year 2025 and now the petitioner has been transferred again. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner cannot be transferred within a short period once he has been transferred on the compassionate ground. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arya Gautam, Atipriya Gautam, Sr. Advocate, Vaishnavi Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jitendra Pal Singh .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)

4. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted the petitioner may approach the authority i.e. respondent no. 2 for redressal of his grievance.

5. In view of the above, the petitioner is permitted to move a representation within a week. In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner within a week, the same shall be decided, by respondent no. 2, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of next four weeks after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned provided that there is no other legal impediment.

6. With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of. October 7, 2026 Ved Prakash WRIA No. 16416 of 2026 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead