Allahabad High Court
A227/14217/2026 of RANDHIR SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS on 6 October 2026
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14217 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i). Issue order or direction directing the learned Additional District Judge Court No.24, Agra to decide the
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 14217 of 2026
Court No. - 9
HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "i). Issue order or direction directing the learned Additional District Judge Court No.24, Agra to decide the Misc. L.A. Case No.234/2025 under Section 20(H) of the Railways Act, 1989 Additional District Magistrate (L.A.) Agra Versus Radhey Shyam and others to the extent it relates to the apportionment of the amount of award of Gata No.299 within shortest possible period of time."
2. It is contended that the land of the petitioner was acquired by Railways Authorities for construction of railway line. An award was made thereafter, the matter was referred to the Additional District judge under Section 20(H) of the Railways Act, 1989 which has been registered as Misc. L.A. Case No. 234 of 2025. The sole prayer made is for expeditious disposal of the same.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to the respondents, at this admission stage, the court below is hereby directed to proceed with the said Misc. L.A. Case No. 234 of 2025 and decide the same within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 7, 2026 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rishikesh Tripathi, Shashwat Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Sanjay Dwivedi (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Randhir Singh .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad